只是他们不说。理由：
1.凡是骂fm2的话基本都适用于m6。论指标m6比fm2还差，最高快门速度低，最高闪光同步速度低，而且还不够重，没法用来砸核桃。
2.m6能用的镜头就是那么几个定焦，加上28-35-50这个怪物，大虾们喜欢的变焦一个都没有。用大虾们的话说，没有“丰富的镜头群”。幸亏这几个定焦头都比较牛，否则早被人贬为“三流厂家”，比美能 达还惨。
3.尽管很难统计，但是我认为很多烧友在器材上花的钱早超过买leica一机二头，部分实际上超过leica一机三头。因为50/2+90/2.8的价格大约1万2千左右。m6机身比F5便宜，更远比1v/1n刚上市时便宜，有 不少人可是尝新的！还有人机身已经换了好几个！其实对普通玩家来说一机三头几乎够用一辈子了。不过这样以来也就没升级的乐趣了。
今天我的猜想终于被证实了。看无忌论坛上的那个“镜皇”的帖子，发现leica m6的得分竟然那么低：
相机 投票数 得分
Nikon N70 158 4.01
Nikon F5 144 4.39
Minolta Maxxum 9 141 4.38
Nikon F100 133 4.47
Canon Rebel 2000 127 4.42
Canon EOS Elan IIE 126 4.37
Nikon N90/N90s 113 4.33
Nikon N60 108 3.96
Pentax PZ-IP 106 4.79
Canon EOS 3 100 4.03
Canon EOS Rebel G 94 3.87
Nikon FM2N 84 4.4
Contax G2 82 4.43
Nikon N80 (New) 80 4.49
Nikon F4 75 4.32
Pentax K1000 (1977) 73 4.49
Pentax ZX-5N 69 4.62
Canon EOS A2E 57 4.16
Canon EOS 1N 53 4.36
Canon EOS A2 52 4.29
Leica M6 51 3.94
xitek列的是投票数超过50的相机，我去camerareview上瞧一了眼，再列三种：
Leica Minilux 20 4.90
Ricoh GR-1 35 4.86
Hasselblad 503CW 21 4.86
以上三种虽然投票数少了些，我认为还是有些意义。令人惊讶的是Minilux，GR-1竟然得分这么高，如果说是因为他们便宜的话，那么同样陈旧、昂贵、难用的Hasselblad 503CW得分竟然也这么高！
再看m6的投票，非常两极分化，大多数都是在5分和1分这两端，折衷的很少。还是鬼子直率，下面是两个典型批评。
________________________________________________
An overrated camera; the centrepeice of a silly religion. Leica could have made the M6 infinitely better by adding a swing-open back for film loading and apeture priority. But Leica doesn't have the resources to do any of that. It took the company three years to introduce a motor winder for the R8. What a shame.
I own the Leica M3 and M4-P, both of which were technological leaders of their time. On the other hand, the M6 just proves how much Leica has fallen behind and how the company has sold out to produce cheapened equipment or laughable "Special Edition" units. Yet the company shamelessly capitalizes on its technical and financial inadequacies in the name of tradition and history. No longer an innovator. The company's marketing is now oriented towards silly collectors and superstitious amatuers, many of who have no idea what photography is about.
Try the M-Mount, 20 year-old Minolta CLE, and one will soon discover what the M6 is missing.
_________________________________________________
Crap. An ergonomic disaster. Fiddly to load. Unreliable meter with lithiums. Bad close-up capability. RF easy out of whack (without any indication). Cluttered finder. Camera with motor (noisy and uneasy to install) falls over. On the street people get intimidated by it as by any camera. 'Silent' shutter of no importance (You either get the shot or loose it).
It's reason for being? 1) rich amateurs with very limited knowledge but with the need to distinguish themselves from others.
2) photojournalists who dream of taking pictures like yesterday's heroes (Capa, Cartier-Bresson) and their epigones (Salgado) and foolishly think the M somewhat will help them.
_________________________________________________
两段话都说得妙极了。如果我买m6的话我就是第二段话里说的第一种了，尽管我不富。
我敢肯定这也是很多中国烧友心里的话，只是他们从来不说。
圣诞节无聊，特灌水一篇，请大虾拍砖时手下留情。
------------------
决不把有限的生命投入到无限的聊天灌水中去！
12-25-2000, 11:39
平板模式
